-
Tor Lillqvist yazdı
There are basicically two classes of cases: 1) Where the code is for obscure historical reasons or what I see as misguided "optimization" split into a more libraries than necessary, and these then are loaded at run-time. Instead, just use direct linking. 2) Where dynamic loading is part of the functionality offered to some upper (scripting etc) layer, or where some system-specific non-LO library is loaded dynamically, as it is not necessarily present on end-user machines. Can't have such in the DISABLE_DYNLOADING case. Change-Id: I9eceac5fb635245def2f4f3320821447bb7cd8c0
97593ae2
Adı |
Son kayıt (commit)
|
Son güncelleme |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
AffineBridge | ||
LogBridge | ||
UnsafeBridge | ||
cppu | ||
helper/purpenv | ||
threadpool | ||
typelib | ||
uno |