- 27 Tem, 2018 27 kayıt (commit)
-
-
Caolán McNamara yazdı
Change-Id: I28b2cd46bf40011f5f813784bd5c182f18ee103f Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58112 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> Tested-by:
-
Markus Mohrhard yazdı
Change-Id: I115590658708bafc7c7778612251ad7eb716b30b Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58150 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com>
-
Miklos Vajna yazdı
Change-Id: I2a4bdcf506720f266344378cdcc71975de4293e0 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58146 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk>
-
Muhammet Kara yazdı
Leftover from 8d3d04ef Change-Id: I4ab7c7eccc8165bdfadba792f2ef8ccf1e52c1c3 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58138 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
Muhammet Kara <muhammet.kara@pardus.org.tr> Reviewed-by:
Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
-
Muhammet Kara yazdı
and the corresponding include for SvtMiscOptions Introduced in 20bb2e70 Leftover from 026e2623 Change-Id: Ibe232045be2396f4a9761d5537b4cc3c9b7af6e1 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58137 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
SfxPoolItem has the curious design of non-deleted copy ctor and deleted copy assignment op. Many derived classes then provide a non-deleted assignment op, apparently more or less on an as-needed basis. But some of those user-provided assignment ops are actually unused (and their presence causes -Werror=deprecated-copy with GCC trunk towards GCC 9 when the---implicitly- defined---copy ctor of the derived class is used), so remove them. In some cases that would still cause -Werror=deprected-copy because of a user-declared dtor, so in those cases explicitly default all the copy/move functions (some of which will then be implicitly defined as deleted). Change-Id: If0d9f1a9f3954263a39ffd27ba895d6202afa307 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58133 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: I1c470ef87e95b22e406099a4e6816693edab2e03 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58131 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc. There appears to be no good reason for these classes to have a deleted copy assignment op, so just change that to implicitly-defined, too. Change-Id: I65fb6ea78a13b7b3d237529613c0489c8cf50614 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58119 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
and fix scanForFiles to return false on error Change-Id: I246e906de9985947be421d361340874c94a2102d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58085 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc. (For LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY, in cppumaker- genered code.) Change-Id: Ia13d945c10600f5793a3247f85a464170ede483d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58116 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
Change-Id: Ib32fb5ddc04df1c090f9d7b319e4ff9be0c285f9 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58007 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future Change-Id: I2b7b6b8baa872addfb2adb0d551d78de1e31c896 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58106 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: Ife5d8eb699b8b6c84b9229ae275dc386fa189bce Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58105 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future Change-Id: I4da623b67ef1792f9dd04382dcb0e772d66bdb40 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58104 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future Change-Id: I58b1b41823fa9eb5f37187272e38a2df80c48afb Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58103 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc. Change-Id: I8c900426c49701afc94094115ec0c2d5b1af90d9 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58102 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc. Change-Id: I206a63f4ed3468bb60505b630a42418ee14d8a0c Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58101 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future Change-Id: I59a845b97071d5de5e0e830304948ce39942e732 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58100 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc. Change-Id: I17480375f747915f95efdd65ac223077e6451782 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58099 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: I725d60235b72e4eec59809e2d09bfab9a2f7c416 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58097 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: I4efe3eb088e5f9096be87dd8240504768755112b Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58096 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: Iaa08ef916a2d266e011a2cb66592b377cb1eb23c Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58095 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already inline, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: Idb59d19dcf5e0873780959797daeb438cbb38ae7 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58072 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future Change-Id: I61182be57a0ed9071e3559a6445aee98ec5c19bf Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58057 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future Change-Id: Iacfdd89ca6ca3af19a56cd26721e1ce2d47c49fa Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58055 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Markus Mohrhard yazdı
Without loading the VBA library any of the functions inside of the library will not be available for spreadsheet functions. Change-Id: I7d0b931ef4817e5870635f43f4b4ae4399780bc4 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58149 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Markus Mohrhard yazdı
Change-Id: Ia48e4b19eb690ba7ab24a37538f6de11a74ad4d3 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58148 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
- 26 Tem, 2018 13 kayıt (commit)
-
-
Olivier Hallot yazdı
* Update helpcontent2 from branch 'master' - tdf#115254 Some branch bookmarks are'nt working 11 module sw m- n- Change-Id: I556041e33ce908d02e510676039370cdf79bc096 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58147 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:Olivier Hallot <olivier.hallot@libreoffice.org>
-
Caolán McNamara yazdı
Change-Id: Iae694be40b32cc3821d326bb362e6091dba19a35 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58079 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Caolán McNamara yazdı
Change-Id: I5fa19422d7ee61e7aad74eae86d843072e94016c Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58087 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Caolán McNamara yazdı
Change-Id: If5345b6515c45bee2742d1293cd181ab46e8e61b Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58088 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already inline, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: Ia4c3442642a2db3ca365a35e56a203a955a415c4 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58080 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Olivier Hallot yazdı
* Update helpcontent2 from branch 'master' - tdf#115254 Some branch bookmarks are'nt working 10 module sw, o- Change-Id: I301f34529ee6c62018d8301d1d16a2cab908e829 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58143 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: -
Julien Nabet yazdı
Launch Math and notice this kind of logs: warn:unotools:4125:4125:unotools/source/config/confignode.cxx:444: DBG_UNHANDLED_EXCEPTION in com::sun::star::uno::Any utl::OConfigurationNode::getNodeValue(const rtl::OUString&) const type: com.sun.star.container.NoSuchElementException message: Active context: configmgr::RootAccess Change-Id: I4bb1af5caaf53086c243cc8e3a2746ff61cbb869 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58081 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>
-
Zdeněk Crhonek yazdı
Change-Id: I1fba51bc60912d4c0c107a88c34c2df91cd8913d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58033 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
Zdenek Crhonek <zcrhonek@gmail.com>
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: Id05e85ac8ac4155e6345b6f96ddf9449f640dc98 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58083 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by removing explicitly user-provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non-deleted in the future Change-Id: If3430e23fff7bb0da12ae20579696869bdf9b3d8 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58082 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc. Change-Id: Ib791cc511acfce457f7ffb2cd2c1a834e4e28734 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58078 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: I08632dcf7ccac1ab7efa0d5e8f4985d74cd31eac Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58077 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...by explicitly defaulting the copy/move functions (and, where needed in turn, also a default ctor) for classes that have a user-declared dtor that does nothing other than an implicitly-defined one would do, but needs to be user- declared because it is virtual and potentially serves as a key function to emit the vtable, or is non-public, etc.; and by removing explicitly user- provided functions that do the same as their implicitly-defined counterparts, but may prevent implicitly declared copy functions from being defined as non- deleted in the future. (Even if such a user-provided function was declared non-inline in an include file, the apparently-used implicitly-defined copy functions are already include, so why bother with non-inline functions.) Change-Id: I20a2c713f0fea62659d44298c1d98dc9b7f2d5aa Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/58076 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by:
-
