Kaydet (Commit) 4e0766bc authored tarafından Enrico Weigelt, metux ITS's avatar Enrico Weigelt, metux ITS Kaydeden (comit) Andras Timar

unusedcode exclude file: symbols known to be required

The file unused.easy contains a lot of symbols which are known
to be required, even they're currently not referenced by anyone.

Change-Id: I048c1656b240f7d601e4c99b8d9c4969b3954c87
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1084Reviewed-by: 's avatarAndras Timar <atimar@suse.com>
Tested-by: 's avatarAndras Timar <atimar@suse.com>
üst fe71e7bd
......@@ -41,5 +41,7 @@ g) there's more actually unused code then what's listed. The idea is that what's
code from the "release" binaries which only makes sense in debug/dbgutil
configurations, and then tackle unused virtual method slots :-)
Symbols that are known to be false alarms are listed in: unused.exclude
[1] http://www.skynet.ie/~caolan/Packages/callcatcher.html
[2] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38832
#
# list of symbols that should not be dropped, even they're not
# referenced in current (linux) builds
#
# test functions that aren't used yet, but will be in near future
# https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/1077/
ScFiltersTest::testColorScaleODS()
ScFiltersTest::testColorScaleXLSX()
apitest::XCellRangesQuery::testQueryFormulaCells()
apitest::XDataPilotDescriptor::testGetHiddenFields()
apitest::XDataPilotFieldGrouping::testCreateDateGroup()
apitest::XCellRangesQuery::testQueryFormulaCells()
apitest::XElementAccess::testGetElementType()
apitest::XElementAccess::testHasElements()
apitest::XIndexAccess::XIndexAccess(int)
apitest::XIndexAccess::testGetByIndex()
apitest::XIndexAccess::testGetByIndexException()
apitest::XIndexAccess::testGetCount()
apitest::XNameReplace::testReplaceByName()
apitest::XPropertySet::testAddPropertyChangeListener()
apitest::XPropertySet::testAddVetoableChangeListener()
apitest::XPropertySet::testRemovePropertyChangeListener()
apitest::XPropertySet::testRemoveVetoableChangeListener()
apitest::XSpreadsheetDocument::testGetSheets()
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment