Skip to content

I
inary
Kaydet (Commit) 9feb6384 authored tarafından Eray Özkural's avatar Eray Özkural
Dosyalara gözat
Seçenekler

* flesh out the version policy document

üst 2d91373c
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 370 additions and 15 deletions
TODO
Dosyayı görüntüle @ 9feb6384
......@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Legend:
/ documentation
/ actionsAPI documentation, unittests (caglar - meren)
/ versioning information document
+ versioning information document
* medium priority
......
doc/mails/[Cekirdek] [PISI design] release hikayesi 0 → 100644
Dosyayı görüntüle @ 9feb6384
From eray@uludag.org.tr Thu Jul 28 16:42:47 2005
Return-Path: <cekirdek-bounces@liste.uludag.org.tr>
X-Original-To: eray@uludag.org.tr
Delivered-To: eray@uludag.org.tr
Received: from liste.uludag.org.tr (pisi.uludag.org.tr [193.140.100.210])
by uludag.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE2C75758;
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:43:24 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from pisi.uludag.org.tr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liste.uludag.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD2D109DF1;
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:43 +0300 (EEST)
X-Original-To: cekirdek@liste.uludag.org.tr
Delivered-To: cekirdek@liste.uludag.org.tr
Received: from uludag.org.tr (comar.uludag.org.tr [193.140.100.220])
by liste.uludag.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AAA109DDB
for <cekirdek@liste.uludag.org.tr>;
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:40 +0300 (EEST)
Received: by uludag.org.tr (Postfix)
id 5D432858B5; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:43:21 +0300 (EEST)
Delivered-To: cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [85.99.19.56])
by uludag.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4ED75758
for <cekirdek@uludag.org.tr>; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:43:19 +0300 (EEST)
From: Eray Ozkural <eray@uludag.org.tr>
Organization: Pardus
To: cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:42:47 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200507281642.47792.eray@uludag.org.tr>
Cc:
Subject: [Cekirdek] [PISI design] release hikayesi
X-BeenThere: cekirdek@liste.uludag.org.tr
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
List-Id: cekirdek.liste.uludag.org.tr
List-Unsubscribe: <http://liste.uludag.org.tr/mailman/listinfo/cekirdek>,
<mailto:cekirdek-request@liste.uludag.org.tr?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://liste.uludag.org.tr/mailman/private/cekirdek>
List-Post: <mailto:cekirdek@liste.uludag.org.tr>
List-Help: <mailto:cekirdek-request@liste.uludag.org.tr?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://liste.uludag.org.tr/mailman/listinfo/cekirdek>,
<mailto:cekirdek-request@liste.uludag.org.tr?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===============1945860385=="
Sender: cekirdek-bounces@liste.uludag.org.tr
Errors-To: cekirdek-bounces@liste.uludag.org.tr
X-UID: 1875
X-Length: 4330
--===============1945860385==
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
selamlar,
dun konustuklarimiz uzerine biraz yatip dusundum. bir ara haci
kuslugu yapmisim ben de ve bir durumu gozden kacirmisim.
dun caglar ve murat'in getirdigi 2. oneriyle karisik bir sey yapmamiz
gerekebilir. benim kafam mi dagilmis ne kusura bakmayin. ama
o kadar onemli degil.
soyle bir sorun var.
simdi bir source var x diye, 5. release'de
icindeki sadece bir paketi ornegin x2'yi etkileyecek bir degisiklik yaptik.
bu durumda x1 ve x3'un build numaralari artmiyor. ama source release
numaralari mi artiyor? tamam buraya kadar ok. ama build sistemi
bu paketlerden yeni bir paket dosyasi yapip repository'e koymuyor bu
durumda, yani source release'i arttigi halde build nosu degismedigi icin
yeni paket koyulmayacak ve indekslenmeyecek bu mantikli mi? mantikli
degilse nasil bir cozum bulunur?
bunun yani sira, simdi bu source release degistiginde, eger paketi build
*edersek*, bir yerde metadata degismek zorunda degil mi? hangi source'un
hangi release'inden build edildigini kaydetmek zorundayiz yanlis mi
dusunuyorum. hemen kizmayin butun bu olaylari basimiza ben sarmadim, bir
sekilde evrimlesti :)
not: galiba olay suna geliyor, tamam build no degismediyse ozunde bu paket
bir onceki source release'inde kalmistir deriz, yani yeni bir dosya kesinlikle
koymayiz repository'e cunku install dosyalari ve metadata, release numarasi
disinda ayni kalacak. offffff.
su anda multiple repository olayinin ilkel versiyonunu kodluyorum bu arada.
gorusuruz,
--
Eray Ozkural (exa), Uludag Gelistiricisi
http://cekirdek.uludag.org.tr/~eray http://www.kde.org
http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo http://www.malfunct.com
--===============1945860385==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Cekirdek mailing list
Cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
http://liste.uludag.org.tr/mailman/listinfo/cekirdek
--===============1945860385==--
doc/mails/[Cekirdek] source release ve binary build numaralari 0 → 100644
Dosyayı görüntüle @ 9feb6384
From eray@uludag.org.tr Tue Jun 28 18:49:13 2005
Return-Path: <cekirdek-bounces@liste.uludag.org.tr>
X-Original-To: eray@uludag.org.tr
Delivered-To: eray@uludag.org.tr
Received: from uludag.org.tr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by uludag.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D2653C00C;
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:07:58 +0300 (EEST)
X-Original-To: cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
Delivered-To: cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
Received: from [192.168.3.131] (unknown [193.140.73.11])
by uludag.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6B753C00C
for <cekirdek@uludag.org.tr>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:07:57 +0300 (EEST)
From: Eray Ozkural <eray@uludag.org.tr>
To: cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:49:13 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200506281549.13525.eray@uludag.org.tr>
Subject: [Cekirdek] source release ve binary build numaralari
X-BeenThere: cekirdek@liste.uludag.org.tr
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
List-Id: cekirdek.liste.uludag.org.tr
List-Unsubscribe: <http://liste.uludag.org.tr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cekirdek>,
<mailto:cekirdek-request@liste.uludag.org.tr?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://liste.uludag.org.tr/cgi-bin/mailman/private/cekirdek>
List-Post: <mailto:cekirdek@liste.uludag.org.tr>
List-Help: <mailto:cekirdek-request@liste.uludag.org.tr?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://liste.uludag.org.tr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cekirdek>,
<mailto:cekirdek-request@liste.uludag.org.tr?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===============2126904290=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: cekirdek-bounces@liste.uludag.org.tr
Errors-To: cekirdek-bounces@liste.uludag.org.tr
X-UID: 865
X-Length: 4347
--===============2126904290==
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
yigitler,
bu post'da dun tartistigimiz bir konuyu ilgilendiren
paket versiyonu numaralarina tam bir aciklik getirmeye
calisacagim.
Bir PISI source'u uc tane sayiyla belirlenir:
name, version, release
Burada version "convenience" icin bulunur. name + release
ise her zaman *ayni* PISI source build islemine sebep olur.
Bundan kasit su. version ve release tamamen bagimsiz.
release 0 ile baslar. ornegin kdevelop
ilk basta
name: kdevelop, version: 3.4.1, release: 0
dir
Bu paketin yeni versiyonlariyla biz ugrastikca, yaptigimiz
her update, en minikleri dahi, release'i arttirir, ve her zaman
bir arttirir (daha aciklayacagim), ama hic bir zaman geriye
gitmez (0'lanmaz ornegin).
ileride:
name: kdevelop, version: 3.4.2, release: 3
olabilir ornegin.
Eger paketin gelistirildigi *distribution* source'u dahilinde
bir versiyon dallanmasi varsa, ancak bu durumda release'e
branch'ler eklenir.
Diyelim ki yukaridaki paket pardus 1.0'in parcasiydi. simdi
pardus 1.0.1 diye bir branch olusturulmak istendi, ornegin
bu UEKAE overlay'ine karsilik gelsin. Bu durumda, versiyon
iliskisini eksiksiz bicimde belirtmek icin:
name: kdevelop, version: 3.4.2, release: 3.1
demek yeterli olacaktir. Ekledigimiz '.1' suffix'i bize butun
dal bilgisini verir. Boylece eksik hicbirsey olmaz.
Binary package'lara gelince. Bir binary package dort
stringle her zaman bulunabilir.
name, version, build, architecture
burada name + build, *bir binary distribution* dahilinde,
ornegin Pardus 1.0 x86 icin yapilmis tek ve tek bir paketi
her zaman gosterir.
Build, o architecture icin, o paketin kacinci kere build
edildigini gosterir. Her paket release'inde en fazla bir
artar.
Bunu daha once tartistigimiz gibi tamamen incremental
build script'inin buldugu md5'larla hesapliyoruz.
Binary package'larin build numarasi icin bir dallanma/budaklanma
semasi henuz onermiyorum, ama bana su anda ayni
source package'lar gibi birsey yapilabilir geliyor. Bana buradaki
en kritik mesele source ve binary package'larini, ve upstream
version string'lerle kendi, SVN-tarzi version string'lerimizi
karistirmamamiz.
Kaplan gunler,
--
Eray
--===============2126904290==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Cekirdek mailing list
Cekirdek@uludag.org.tr
http://liste.uludag.org.tr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cekirdek
--===============2126904290==--
doc/package_versions.tex
Dosyayı görüntüle @ 9feb6384
\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
\title{P\'IS\'I Packages: Version Policy}
\title{P\.IS\.I Packages: Version Policy v0.2}
\date{\today}
\author{T. Bar\i{}\c s Metin}
\author{Eray \"Ozkural and T. Bar\i{}\c s Metin}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\section*{Revision History}
\begin{itemize}
\item v0.1: Bar\i\c s Metin wrote the first version preparing the outline,
detailed Source Version Section, and started the Section on Release Number.
\item v0.2: Eray \"Ozkural wrote a detailed introduction, added
explanations of release and build numbers, reorganized a bit.
\end{itemize}
\section{Introduction}
We'll document the \emph{version policy} that applies to the P\'IS\'
packages.
This document explains the \emph{version policy} that applies to
P\.IS\.I packages. Classically, the issue of distinguishing source and
binary distributions unambiguously has not received a rigorous
treatment in the context of LINUX distributions. We have identified
several shortcomings of the usual practices of extending the original
version with suffixes and prefixes, colorfully illustrated in the
following common problems.
\begin{description}
\item[The problem of future downgrades]
The distribution chooses to use a previous version of the package in
the next release. There is no way to indicate this, so ad-hoc
solutions such as version prefixes are used. It is
impossible to denote a future dependency that requires at least this
distribution source release in this case, either.
\item[The problem of redundant distributions]
A trivial patch has been applied to the source. While few binary
packages have been affected by this change, all binary packages
built from the source are redistributed.
\item[The problem of underdetermined rebuilds]
There have been rapid changes in the system, and although no
changes have been made to the package source, a new binary
distribution must be prepared.
\end{description}
We have devised a slightly new approach in order to alleviate these
problems. Our solution consists of encoding the history of source and
binary package developments in separate version strings we call release and
build numbers.
Since the source version is usually used by the users and developers
to identify software, we retain the notion of a source version in
P\.IS\.I as a convenience.
In the following sections, we explain the components of our
versioning scheme.
\section{Source Version}
\subsection{Source Version}
Source version is the version number provided is provided by the
upstream maintainer of the source archive used in package. It must be
......@@ -21,7 +69,7 @@ always the same as the upstream version used.
\textbf{Example}: If the upstream archive name is
\emph{bash-3.0.tar.gz} the version number of the package is \emph{3.0}
\subsection{Version Suffixes}
\subsubsection{Version Suffixes}
There is a pre-defined list of suffixes a package version can
take.
......@@ -43,19 +91,91 @@ suffix. \textbf{Example}: packagename-1.0\_beta1
The basic order of the priorities for suffixes is:\newline
\emph{p $>$ (no suffix) $>$ rc $>$ pre $>$ beta $>$ alpha}.
The scope of a source version string is global in the literal
sense.
\section{Release Number}
The support for these special suffixes as well as usual alphanumeric
version string ordering has been implemented in P\.IS\.I.
Release number is the number of the changes that is made to the
package source. A change can be a patch applied to the source archive,
modification in the actions.py, pspec.xml or any file in the source
package directory.
\section{Identifying Package Sources}
\emph{Detailed explanation is needed}
A PISI source has three identity elements written under
\texttt{SOURCE} tag: name, source version, and source release number.
We usually say just version and release number/release instead of
source version and source release number, respectively. Name is available in
the \texttt{<Name>} tag. Version and release are available in the last
\texttt{<Update>} element of \texttt{<History>} tag.
\section{Build Number}
The name of a source package is constant throughout its revision
history. The version is the original version, given by its
programmers. Release is a nonnegative integer. Name and release is sufficient to uniquely identify a
particular PISI source revision. That is, version and release are
independent.
\subsection{Release Number}
Release number is the number of the changes that are made to the
package source since the initial version in the distribution source. A
change can be a patch applied to the source archive, modification in
the actions.py, pspec.xml or any file in the source package
directory. This change is indicated in \texttt{<Update>} tags manually
by the package maintainer.
The initial release of a package is by default \texttt{0}. The release
number always increments by $1$ in each revision in the
\texttt{History}, even the slightest ones, but it never decrements.
The scope of the release number is a given distribution, regardless of
its version, e.g. Pardus.
In the near future, PISI will have strict checks for release numbers.
\emph{Detailed explanation is needed}
\subsection{Dependency Specifications}
We allow a package to use both source version and release to identify
a particular or a range of package versions.
\section{Identifying Binary packages}
A PISI binary package is produced from a PISI source package. It has a
name that is constant throughout the history of the source package,
and it inherits the source version and release number from the source
package. However, a binary package has in addition a binary build
number. Shortly, build number or just build. For each of the
architecture targets, e.g. particular binaries, it also has an
architecture tag.
A binary package is uniquely identified by its name, build number, and
architecture regardless of the source version.
\section{Build Number}
Similarly to source release number, binary build number is the number
of changes that are made to a binary package. By change, we mean any
bit change. The existence of a change is tested by comparing the
cryptographic checksums in files.xml with the previous build, and the
build number is automatically determined by the P\.IS\.I build system.
The user never interferes with the build number himself. However, if
the user fails to provide the previous build, then a package without
a build number is built.
The scope of a build number is a given distribution build environment
for a particular architecture. Therefore, it is not used in dependency
specifications.
\section{Package File Names}
A P\.IS\.I binary package file name contains all the components relevant
to its identification, separated by dashes:
\begin{verbatim}
<binary name>-<source version>-<source release>-<binary build>.pisi
\end{verbatim}
\section{Future Work}
In the future, it may be necessary to extend the notion of release
number and build number to support branches and forks of a
distribution. A proposal was to have CVS-like branching.
\end{document}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment