1. 17 Kas, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  2. 16 Kas, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  3. 09 Kas, 2018 3 kayıt (commit)
  4. 08 Kas, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  5. 07 Kas, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  6. 29 Eki, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  7. 28 Eki, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  8. 27 Eki, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  9. 26 Eki, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  10. 24 Eki, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  11. 23 Eki, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  12. 17 Eki, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  13. 16 Eki, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  14. 15 Eki, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  15. 09 Eki, 2018 3 kayıt (commit)
  16. 08 Eki, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  17. 07 Eki, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  18. 28 Eyl, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  19. 27 Eyl, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  20. 24 Eyl, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  21. 20 Eyl, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)
  22. 19 Eyl, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  23. 17 Eyl, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
    • Caolán McNamara's avatar
      rename to weld::ComboBox are they are not text only now · 76c7cabc
      Caolán McNamara yazdı
      Change-Id: Ice26d1fd2ad97a6959c6916fef428777efea9c2d
      Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/60500
      Tested-by: Jenkins
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarCaolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: 's avatarCaolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
      76c7cabc
    • Stephan Bergmann's avatar
      New loplugin:external · 206b5b26
      Stephan Bergmann yazdı
      ...warning about (for now only) functions and variables with external linkage
      that likely don't need it.
      
      The problems with moving entities into unnamed namespacs and breaking ADL
      (as alluded to in comments in compilerplugins/clang/external.cxx) are
      illustrated by the fact that while
      
        struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
        int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
        namespace N {
          struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } };
          int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); }
        }
        int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
      
      returns 1, both moving just the struct S2 into an nunnamed namespace,
      
        struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
        int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
        namespace N {
          namespace { struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } }; }
          int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); }
        }
        int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
      
      as well as moving just the function f overload into an unnamed namespace,
      
        struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
        int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
        namespace N {
          struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } };
          namespace { int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); } }
        }
        int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
      
      would each change the program to return 0 instead.
      
      Change-Id: I4d09f7ac5e8f9bcd6e6bde4712608444b642265c
      Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/60539
      Tested-by: Jenkins
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarStephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
      206b5b26
  24. 13 Eyl, 2018 2 kayıt (commit)
  25. 10 Eyl, 2018 1 kayıt (commit)